SCENARIOS are IMAGES
OF POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE FUTURES
- Become aware of what
is out there
- Create a system for
classifying and analyzing them
- [see handout]
- People's perceptions
of futures as positive or negative are completely subjective and
relative
- What sort of questions
would you consistently ask in order usefully to compare different
images of the future?
EXAMPLE IMAGES of the FUTURE / SCENARIOS from MOVIES and
TELEVISION:
The cityscape
from Metropolis by Fritz Lang
- Metropolis
filmed in 1926
- Originally a silent
film
- Re-released with
a sound track
- Fritz Lang was inspired
by the skyline of Manhattan
- 37,000 people in
the cast
- $2 million to film
in 1926!
- An historical image
of the future
- He was visioning
ahead to 1965
- Magnificent city
based on incredible poverty in use of middle and lower classes
as slaves
- Typical have/have
not story
- Hilter and Goebbels
loved this film
- They wanted Fritz
Lang to make movies for the Third Reich; he fled to Hollywood
- To him this city
was a wonderful image of the future
- The workers live
below the ground
- Has a robot that
incites the workers to revolt
Strange
Days
- Murder mystery with
political overtones
- Plot twist revolves
around a new technology
- A recording device
that allows memories to be recorded by one person and played back
by another with all sensory perception
- It is addictive
- Set at the turn of
the new Millennium
- Riots
- The one technology
change creates a whole set of new issues for society to deal with
- Gives rise to a lot
of social changes
- Politics
- Crime
- Art
- Could people edit
their memories
- Basically, an implied
image of the future
- Provocative
- Not very explicit
- Cf. Brainstorm
GATTACA:
- Genetic engineering
- Very detailed
- Extrapolates one
trend
- Very well fleshed
out
- Exploring this one
particular social issue
- How easily it would
be for society to fall into genetic engineering of all children
- Genetic counseling
scene
- Select the most compatible
candidate
- Gender
- Eyes, hair & skin
- "Give your child
the best possible start."
- "This child is still
you, simply the best of you."
- Children could sue
their parents for wrongful birth for failing to optimize them
- Italian scientist
plans to do human cloning
- There are 400,000
risk factors in the genome
- Needs a breakthrough
in theoretical mathematics to actually do it
- British House of
Lords just approved limited embryo cloning
- We are on the road
to this scenario Deep
Impact
- She makes up with
her father, just before they die
- Cf. Armageddon
Zardoz
- Made in the 1960s
- Post-apocalyptic
future
- The Vortex vs. the
Outlands
- Set in 2293
- Viewpoint = Zed's
(Sean Connery)
- Societal level of
analysis
- Comparison of the
outlands vs. the Vortex
- Image of a high tech
green future
- A transcendent or
transformative vision
- Zed undoes the Vortex
and brings the new technology to all humanity
- The horrors of living
to the Vortex
- Technologies
- Antigravity
- Antiaging
- To what extent is
the past included in the image of the future?
- A small chunk of
humanity has progressed, technologically
- The bulk of society
has regressed to a nomadic society
- Zardoz got its name
from "the Wizard of Oz"
- Familiar objects
in the houses
- Spelling was more
phonetic
- The Vortexes were
small bubbles scattered about the planet
Johnny
Mnemonic
- William Gibson coined
the term "cyberspace"
- Corporations opposed
by the Lo-Teks
- Set in 2021
- Johnny is articulating
the scenario
- Promoting the outclasses
(Lo-Teks)
- Interest-group focused
- Haves (corporate)
- Have nots (Lo-Teks)
- News broadcast and
the advertisements within them
- Explains history
- Sets the context
- Cf. Robo Cop
- Familiar technologies
- Elevators
- Alarm clocks
- Taxi cab
- Helicopters
- Remote control
- Technical expertise
in Japan (not Mexico)
- New technologies
- Memory upgrade
- TV was telephone
as well
- Microfilament garrote
- Memory input
- Body augmentation
- We are our tools
- Technology is embedded
in people
- God is embedded in
technology
- The Internet becomes
smart: artificial intelligence
- This is a short story
from the book, Burning Chrome, by William Gibson
- Gibson takes familiar
technologies and incorporates them in his transformative futures
- Incredible amount
of very specific detail
- Detail is important
- This approach increases
our comfort in grappling with the new by providing aspects of
the familiar
- Acceptability (plausibility)
- Focus of those things
that have been changed
- The chip implant
came at the cost of memories of his childhood
Plausibility:
- We need to be careful
with our clients
- When we are playing,
we can stretch further
- Two kinds of transformation:
- Jim Dator is very
interested in transformational futures;
- he focusses less
on plausibility as a mark of quality in a scenario --
- You can be as transformative
as you want as long as it is internally consistent
- What is the purpose
of the scenario you are preparing?
- Futurists are often:
- Overzealous in
predicting what will change in the short term
- Underestimate
what will happen in 50 years
DISCUSSION OF READINGS
"Afterword"
from Earth, by David Brin
- The words to describe
inventions are from the language of the inventors
- Change the language
to convey changes that have occurred in the future
- "The door 'irised'
open."
"Escape
Routes" from The Language of the Night, by Ursula
K. Le Guin
- She condemned escapism
- This was written
in the mid-1970s, at the time of renaissance of science fiction
- The author
- Our context drives
how we think and what we do
- K stands for Kroeber,
both of whom were anthropologists
- They had high academic
standards
- She is defending
science fiction as serious literature
- Futurists get accused
of the same thing
- This is entertaining,
but what's the point
- Science fiction offers
literature the opportunity to face an open universe (p. 207)
- Sturgeon's Law
- Critic: "95%
of science fiction is shit."
- Sturgeon: "But
95% of everything is shit."
- Escapism
- She overlooked the
value of it
- Escapism allows the
average person to envision
- Escapism encourages
a freer mindset
- Scenarios help us
to articulate our values
- Take a big picture
view
- Suggestions for improving
science fiction
- Intellectual coherence
- Scientific plausibility
- Stylistic competence
- Different roots
- US is fascinated
with technology and the frontier spirit
- Europe is fascinated
with political and social impact
- Cf. Artistic corollaries
between what science fiction artists drew 20 years before NASA
created things
- Art can precede technology
- Science fiction was
a source of creativity
- Read the nominees
for
- Hugo awards
- Nebula awards
"The
Futurist Tells Stories" by Donald N. Michael
- Suggests criteria
for good scenarios
BRAINSTORMING CRITERIA
FOR COMPARING DIFFERENT IMAGES OF THE FUTURE; RESULTS:
- Brainstorm ideas to
help you create a critical framework in order to complete assignment
one, which asks you to analyze three different scenarios.
- Think about how you
want to compare them;
- What is important
in comparing different images of the future?
- Creat a comparative
framework that could be used for images of the future in many
different media.
Ideas generated by class:
- Which characters
are the primary stakeholders?
- What message(s) is
the image trying to convey about our present?
What is the social scale?
- How does the image
portray society, as we know it?
- Which class takes
social precedence in this image?
- What pieces would
have to fall into place for this to happen?
- What key things are
required for this image to become a reality?
- How widely usable
is the scenario?
- How similar/different
is it from the present?
- What aspects intersect?
- What is ambiguous?
- What is women's position
in the image?
- Historical links:
when is this future taking place?
- Are the characters
in the image plausible?
- What is familiar?
- What laws of science
are broken?
- Is there a connection
to the present?
Values:
- Is it fundamentally
hopeful or a warning?
- Who wins and won
loses?
- What values are embodied
in the image?
- Which do you prefer?
- What has been gained
vs. what has been lost?
- How many clients
could the image benefit or impact?
- What companies or
special interest groups?
- Who has the most
fun?
Scenario details:
- To what extent does
image cover changes across all the STEEP categories?
- What are the communication
and transportation technologies?
- What is the mainstream
of educational tools?
- Is the environment
green or safe?
- How will the environment
be impacted?
- Which image is most
plausible?
- Is there any type
of underground activity?
- How ethnically diverse
is the image?
Content comparisons:
- Where are the images
in conflict?
- Overall, how detailed
is the image?
- What is the theme/focus
of the image?
- What type of transformational
change overall (technological or psychological)?
Other viewpoints
and points of comparison:
- Origin
- Where?
- Who created it?
- Why did they do it
(agenda/purpose)?
- Who is the intended
audience?
- When was it created?
- Where was it created?
- How was it created
(what method)?
- In what language
was it created?
- Who paid for it?
- Medium: how
was it expressed?
- Movie
- Book
- Advertisement
- Screenplay
- Poetry
- Music
- Crossword puzzles
- Pamphlets
- Theater
- PowerPoint
- List of phrases
- Report
- Mathematics
- Style
- Comedy
- Drama
From these questions
and ideas -- and those that you raise yourself --
create a critical framework that you will use whenever you run into
a scenario of the future.
NEXT MODULE:
Ten different
examples of scenario building techniques;
give a five minute presentation on them
(also can be used for one of your scenarios; they are examples
of different methods):
- Global Business
Network on education
- Wired scenario
re plague
- Health futures
in England
- Hawaii Office of
State Planning
- SRI corporate planning
- Hanapepe Community
Study
- Demos scenario
building
- Seven Tomorrows
by Hawkins
- Beyond the Limits
From quantitative,
through structured to artistic/inspirational
|
|