This course
will begin by reviewing trends of change in global geopolitical and
economic systems. Given this context of change, participants will
examine the various systems of social and economic governance proposed
and implemented in the past, in order to identify the different possible
components of governance and economic systems. They will then augment
and critique these traditional approaches to designing governance
with current work suggesting alternative social, economic, and political
systems, and with visions of future cultures presented in speculative
fiction. Participants will spend the first two thirds of the course
creating a "tool and parts box" for designing new social, political,
and economic systems.
And then they'll design
one. For communities sized between one-quarter million and a million,
forty years from now, in an environment humans do not currently
inhabit [undersea habitat; high earth orbit; colony on another planet,
moon, or asteroid in our solar system]. This class will interact,
whenever possible, with similar design classes ongoing at the University
of Hawaii, Eastern Oregan State University, and Northern Arizona
University, via the SolSys Internet simulation system.
Assignments:
- Brief, three-page,
bullet-point comparisons of two of the following: 1) the ideologies
considered; 2) the systems and components of governance reviewed;
3) the styles of representation and participation reviewed; and
4) the approaches to citizenship and leadership (i.e., two brief
comparative reports total) -- 20% of final grade;
- Book report (5 pages)
on one classic utopia, reviewed with reference to Kanter's and
Shenker's analyses of intentional communities, written and presented
to the class -- 20% of final grade;
- Book report (5 pages)
analyzing cultural, economic, and political structures embedded
in one speculative fiction novel, written and presented to class
-- 20% of final grade;
- Team project designing
governance/economic/cultural system for future human colony, with
presentation to class (written document about 12-16 pp. from group)
-- 20% of final grade;
- Description of participant's
own preferred political, economic, and cultural future, 5 pages
-- 20% of final grade.
Formats: comparisons
may be essays, bullet points, tables or graphics. Book report style
sheet is attached. Team design project and participant preference
report formats will be finalized after class discusses and decides
on design parameters for governance systems.
Grading: see attached
University grading policy. Any written work may be revised and resubmitted
for a grade revision, on the student's initiative.
Abilities/Outcomes:
- Using a "political
futuristics" perspective:
- Identifying patterns
of change in political, economic, and social systems;
- Comparing and critiquing
different forms of economic and political systems;
- Uncovering the social
and cultural assumptions underlying political and economic systems;
- Creating alternative
cultures for the future with logically consistent economic and
political systems;
- Committing to a preferred
cultural/economic/political future.
- Communication of futures
concepts and topics:
This course will require and facilitate clear and concise writing;
speaking skills in the form of questions asked and presentations
made; group process skills in the form of brainstorming, and facilitating
and recording discussions; and lateral thinking skills in the
form of questioning assumptions and structured provocations.
- Applying the futures
perspective personally:
Clarifying one's own cultural, economic, and political assumptions
and values;
Defining a preferred cultural, economic, and political future
for oneself.
*Required Texts* THESE MAY CHANGE, SUBJECT
TO AVAILABILITY.
HAGUE, R., M. HARROP, and S. BRESLIN
Comparative Government and Politics, 3rd edition.
1992 London: Macmillan.
ECCLESHALL, R. AND V.
GEOGHEGAN, R. JAY, M. KENNY, I. MACKENZIE, AND R. WILFORD
Political Ideologies: an introduction, 2nd edition.
1994 New York: Routledge.
[Out of print selection
-- will try to find used copies to put on reserve.]
MCCORD, William M.
Voyages to Utopia: from monastery to commune, the search for
the perfect society in modern times
1990 New York
MASINI, Eleonora, ed.
Visions of Desirable Societies
1983 Oxford: Pergamon Press.
*Supplemental/Recommended*
KANTER, Rosabeth M.
Commitment and Community: communes and utopias in sociological
perspective.
1972 Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
SHENKER, Barry
Intentional Communities: ideology and alienation in communal
societies
1986 London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Examples from speculative fiction:
SOCIETY
|
AUTHOR
|
TITLE
|
DATE/PUBLISHER
|
scarcity anarchy
|
Ursula LEGUIN
|
The Dispossessed
|
1974/New York:
Harper
|
abundance anarchy
|
James P. HOGAN
|
Voyage from
Yesteryear
|
1982/New York:
Ballantine/ Del Rey
|
techno/human potential/mandarinism
|
Walter Jon WILLIAMS
|
Aristoi
|
1992/London: Grafton/
Harper Collins
|
techno/spiritual/
monarchy
|
Patricia KENNEALLY
|
The Copper
Crown
|
1984/New York:
Signet
|
environmental/green
feudalism
|
Austin Tappan WRIGHT
|
Islandia
|
1942/New York:
Signet
|
environmental communitarianism
|
Kim Stanley ROBINSON
|
Pacific Edge
|
1990/New York:
Tom Doherty Associates
|
post-holocaust
communal matriarchy
|
Sheri S. TEPPER
|
The Gate
to Women's Country
|
1988/New York:
Bantam/ Spectra
|
space-age federalist
democracy
|
Diane DUANE
|
Spock's World
|
1989/New York:
Pocket Books
|
electronic direct
democracy
|
John BRUNNER
|
Shockwave
Rider
|
1988/New York:
???
|
AI social stewardship
|
Iain M. BANKS
|
The Player
of Games
|
1990/New York:
Harper/ Collins
|
FORMAT: BOOK REPORTS
Header: Author.
Name of the Book. Place published: publisher, date of publication.
Number of pages.
Body: After stating
all the pertinent information listed above, a book review should
contain at least a paragraph (conventionally at least four
sentences long) on each of the following:
- why you picked that
book to review (liked the cover? friend recommended it? threw
darts at the book list? came to you in a dream?);
- brief summary of the
plot or narrative: this will certainly take more than one paragraph,
but should take less than six -- do, however, mention crucial
information like the main character's name, where and when the
action takes place, etc.;
- describe as best you
can, from what the author describes outright or implies, a) what
system of governance exists in this future; b) what the characteristics
of the economic system are (production, distribution, currency);
c) strong underlying values or social assumptions -- each of these
will require at least one paragraph.
- describe as best you
can, from what the author describes outright or implies, how this
society was created out of the present-day, or conditions like
the present day. Was the transition peaceful or violent? A matter
of the exile of a group of like-minded folks? A gradual evolution
in social, economic, and political structures?
- Imagine yourself living
in the culture of this book. What are its strengths and weaknesses?
Advantages and disadvantages? What does it feel like to you --
do you like it?
- Finally, tell us if
the author wrote the story well -- did you enjoy the book overall?
This looks like requirements
for a ten-page paper, but trust me, it isn't. Be concise; try just
sketching succinctly the author's key thoughts and your impressions.
YOUR IMPRESSIONS are critical -- and don't just say you like or
didn't like some aspect of this future, say WHY. Be as specific
as possible; citing descriptive phrases from the work helps.
One more thing: I am
a compulsive editor, and it is possible that your book report will
be returned to you with red corrections all over it. THIS WILL IN
NO WAY AFFECT YOUR GRADE, WHICH IS BASED SOLELY ON CONTENT. On the
other hand, experience tells me that salable skills in business
include the ability to write clearly, logically, and, where possible,
elegantly. This editing service is extended as an aid to improving
your writing skills. If you have any questions, or are totally outraged,
please come talk. WLS
|